From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] New tab-bar-detach-tab command Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 14:53:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87r1d0woq1.fsf@alphapapa.net> References: <87h7e4ikkz.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87pmsrrh7y.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875yujizgi.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87o88bb21y.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871r57i2cz.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87k0iu6n6x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lf388zo5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 21:55:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU40-0009Wd-UZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:55:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46806 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU3z-0002ro-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU2M-0001Uj-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:37062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU2K-0005KE-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXU2I-0007Dv-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:54:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276262 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >>> The new window-detaching command is implemented now, but still >>> no idea where to bind these commands: tab-detaching and window-detaching. >> >> Other than "C-x t d", which we already discussed, the best idea I can >> think of is something like "C-x t -", the minus being somewhat >> mnemonic. > > Indeed, the key doesn't need to be the first letter of the command name. > For example, since 'C-x t d' was already bound to 'dired-other-tab', > for 'tab-duplicate' I added 'C-x t n' with the mnemonic of "new". > > But a month ago a new command 'clone-frame' was added with the > keybinding 'C-x 5 c'. So now we have two similar commands with > different keys: 'c' - clone frame, and 'n' - duplicate tab. > > Or maybe these commands are quite different? I tried 'clone-frame', > but it neither clones nor duplicates the frame - it creates > a completely new window configuration on the new frame. I suppose a `tab-clone' command would be more concise than `tab-duplicate', and it would also fit with other commands like `clone-buffer' (I don't see any other commands in my Emacs with "duplicate" in the name). Then the binding could be "C-x t c".