From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs master + org Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 19:23:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87r11zev45.fsf@igel.home> References: <83bkt42ifq.fsf@gnu.org> <87a68ovw0b.fsf@posteo.net> <835yjc2c6f.fsf@gnu.org> <8335eg2ao9.fsf@gnu.org> <874jyv29k3.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9925"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Gregory Heytings , philipk@posteo.net, silent2600@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 01 19:27:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oIZC8-0002JX-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 19:27:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIZC7-00026A-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIZ8L-0007Mh-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:52744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIZ8J-0007gu-AB; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LxQ1m0MRpz1s7bp; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:23:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LxQ1l6Ygmz1qqkQ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:23:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7mwLEQk-EQJe; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:23:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: iOYhZ/ectA//piUBViFnqbA4/Hc33KxLi1wACqvQER0eHT649Ocxsu8aZ25ehr1J Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-169-222.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.169.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:23:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADC522C3369; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:23:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I'm encased in the lining of a pure pork sausage!! In-Reply-To: <874jyv29k3.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 01 Aug 2022 18:49:32 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.10; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292952 Archived-At: On Aug 01 2022, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I had a quick look at some things in byte-defop-compiler that have > changed arity (or made things optional) to see whether that's happened > before, and it has. This is about the change in the bytecode interpreter. The same opcode now pops 3 values from the stack instead of just two, making it unbalanced. You will probably see aborts if you compile bytecomp.c with -DBYTE_CODE_SAFE. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."