From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:59:41 -0500 Message-ID: <87r0z7g0w2.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org> <8735c6b0wo.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1ty9lha.fsf@gnus.org> <87lepym6ok.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877d1i9h7k.fsf@gnus.org> <83edvqyr3q.fsf@gnu.org> <874jwl8e4p.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmf64beo.fsf@gnus.org> <87h70i4a46.fsf@gnus.org> <83tu4irzl1.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1ttsrve.fsf@yahoo.com> <83r0zlqxcr.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsfqi95f.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87wn915t5r.fsf@gnus.org> <87czatgfza.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87ilkk16rj.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35958"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Po Lu , akrl@sdf.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, david@tethera.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 16 19:02:05 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ok71Y-00098H-OY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:02:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok71X-0006ip-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 13:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6zT-0005p1-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:37500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6zR-0007cO-QB; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93AAC20177; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:59:42 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E19414E4AA; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:59:41 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <87ilkk16rj.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.33.119.55; envelope-from=rlb@defaultvalue.org; helo=defaultvalue.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297874 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > My guess is that we don't do much testing for the unwritable filesystems > case, so there may be many bugs in this area. Oh, bugs are "fine". Right now, on that front, we just wanted to explain the situation and determine what the expectations are. i.e. if we hit trouble there, from the upstream perspective are we in "don't do that then" territory, or have we found something that might warrant attention? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4