From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation and gc Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 14:31:18 +0000 Message-ID: <87r0tvuzpl.fsf@localhost> References: <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i.ref@Ergus> <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i@Ergus> <87a60k657y.fsf@web.de> <838rg4zmg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttyrwobj.fsf@localhost> <20230311111730.fatow74xnbel7t3f@Ergus> <83o7ozwju8.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzznwjh3.fsf@localhost> <83jzznwjeh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsabwirg.fsf@localhost> <83h6urwhu0.fsf@gnu.org> <875yb7wgpd.fsf@localhost> <83bkkzwgcp.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1o3v1fr.fsf@localhost> <838rg3wf7k.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8j7v0a4.fsf@localhost> <835yb7were.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35021"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, arne_bab@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 15:30:44 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pb0F9-0008vf-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 15:30:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pb0EM-00071L-FT; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:29:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pb0EK-00070O-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:29:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pb0EI-0000g2-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:29:51 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EB824026F for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 15:29:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1678544988; bh=84HqBhhSfbiaQN1RvDmAplQLuYogrZug6RG28SpbnWI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=nTa4RxdoiaiPhWYwg5wjvFJr3BdLyWs9xc+zDFED7ytBdd6vWDlGmOK7aP114FZg6 VqvLtAJ47e8OS+nyKdlCwcL7p8BGrwyEoV2sLBUxfLYPCw1GfsJt53ZzzeQsyjbq1P Tua5Vpj6gxG8RoDFjyFzSEjAznrmc8t9eTstfdjJaLYwhwZNUT/cwfTMfpU9zM7xYz n5+iwBcQ7b+t9JIi1ESPCL93h3rNwYzNF7/vB3TR0SQlfoukETcvK3j/E/0kSm6B4y Iu5yQhwPd6A4cS9qLh8aWI178rFRmC4omVJ4+aCVNAQIH5KhtBErAKOoaRDNaeLYiH ejeLadsKCzGAA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PYlgG5bWZz6tm4; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 15:29:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <835yb7were.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304321 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I was referring to your example in >> https://old.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/bg85qm/garbage_collector_magic_hack/emk013p/, >> if I understand it correctly. > > That was meant just to demonstrate what could happen in principle, not > describe real-life uses that matter to most of us. It even says so. > > IMO, having such synthetic examples in the manual won't help much, > because people will reject them outright ("this can never happen to > me"). Well. Currently, the paragraph reads like: we have 800kb default, but do not increase it too much because Emacs will require more memory. Given that modern computer typically have 4-16Gb RAM, the warning does not look like an actual warning. 800kb is nothing. Surely, increasing it to 80Mb to even few hundreds Mb is safe, right? Or not? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at