* roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
@ 2023-10-02 23:10 Emanuel Berg
2023-10-03 6:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Emanuel Berg @ 2023-10-02 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Do we have a roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
What I mean is, do we have a plan for that to
happen, ultimately?
If one had such a roadmap, maybe one would have the whole
picture becoming more clear - but also, possibly one could
identify areas where we could do incremental steps, to reach
the goal?
And those steps could be beneficial in their own right, as is
often the case as, if the goal is good, the steps there are
good as well?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
2023-10-02 23:10 roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs? Emanuel Berg
@ 2023-10-03 6:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-10-03 19:47 ` Emanuel Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2023-10-03 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emanuel Berg; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 01:10:10 +0200
>
> Do we have a roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
>
> What I mean is, do we have a plan for that to
> happen, ultimately?
We have general goals, not a detailed plan with specific changes in
various Emacs subsystems. Figuring out the (non-trivial) details is
part of the job, I think, as there can be different approaches with
correspondingly different trade-offs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
2023-10-03 6:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2023-10-03 19:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-10-04 7:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Emanuel Berg @ 2023-10-03 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> What I mean is, do we have a plan for that to
>> happen, ultimately?
>
> We have general goals, not a detailed plan with specific
> changes in various Emacs subsystems. Figuring out the
> (non-trivial) details is part of the job, I think, as there
> can be different approaches with correspondingly different
> trade-offs.
Is there a document or anything where efforts are coordinated?
General or detailed?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
2023-10-03 19:47 ` Emanuel Berg
@ 2023-10-04 7:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-10-04 13:30 ` Emanuel Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2023-10-04 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emanuel Berg; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 21:47:34 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> What I mean is, do we have a plan for that to
> >> happen, ultimately?
> >
> > We have general goals, not a detailed plan with specific
> > changes in various Emacs subsystems. Figuring out the
> > (non-trivial) details is part of the job, I think, as there
> > can be different approaches with correspondingly different
> > trade-offs.
>
> Is there a document or anything where efforts are coordinated?
>
> General or detailed?
Not that I know of. Primarily, IMO, because there are no efforts yet
to coordinate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs?
2023-10-04 7:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2023-10-04 13:30 ` Emanuel Berg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Emanuel Berg @ 2023-10-04 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> We have general goals, not a detailed plan with specific
>>> changes in various Emacs subsystems. Figuring out the
>>> (non-trivial) details is part of the job, I think, as
>>> there can be different approaches with correspondingly
>>> different trade-offs.
>>
>> Is there a document or anything where efforts
>> are coordinated?
>>
>> General or detailed?
>
> Not that I know of. Primarily, IMO, because there are no
> efforts yet to coordinate.
If we say officially that we go for a multi-threaded Emacs
I am positive a lot of guys will want to be part of that.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-04 13:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-02 23:10 roadmap for a multi-threaded, multi-core Emacs? Emanuel Berg
2023-10-03 6:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-10-03 19:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-10-04 7:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-10-04 13:30 ` Emanuel Berg
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).