From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5a125fb5a97 1/2: Update to Org 9.7.3 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:08:59 +0000 Message-ID: <87r0d271g4.fsf@localhost> References: <171796793548.23337.12512115872160390161@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240609211858.A2C31C1F9FB@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a5jtd403.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6e1lhtd.fsf@kyleam.com> <8734plcvg9.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Kyle Meyer , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 12 15:09:56 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNje-000AUh-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:09:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNhE-0007qO-Kd; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:07:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNhC-0007kC-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNh9-0000Y8-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9102E24002A for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:07:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718197637; bh=x6Tu7hhTNJAfpxCiu8t8tbk9tzVu8WV7LpwhG7amXKg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=ZdIhuInwhqtKEGnGst0EzFaPJaKaJf9hFfPvFhQke6i/bVWPi5/YSfOJ3igz/6Sj0 +Jp15bumY7fjMjjWI4vnr1y+4ZhSLqXSuQuWvEsQrH0YyVojvBiQD1Rz+v8JHAmEEq 6ia96flNzB/cxbITnZrUZxsbR3czxlbFxmIS66nDHCY37eMTAY36y6qARYUBH0qSa1 J4iD2+077zt9271OVJ2isXhX28ZwivF+AWMGiGmJdqt1yWE36RnfCZKDvTfmUiwOMA yqXAqHI0plIsSMOEXBCd+d2kyVgy7fPAbj2WY2owgjSQYgBts7q6sCDK8PK5lHZFFZ NnHZcbepBjCVg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Vzm6F03Dwz9rxP; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:07:16 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8734plcvg9.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319994 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: >>> This interferes with bootstrapping org.texi, for which I've installed a >>> temporary workaround that you should revert once the error is resolved >>> on Org's part. >> >> Could you please provide more details about the error? I don't see any >> specifics mentioned in 8d1d9798f77 (Fix bootstrap of org.texi), and >> running 'make bootstrap' on its parent commit (77d0eed74e1) completes >> without errors for me. > > Yes, here's a complete backtrace from Org: > ... > Error: arith-error nil > ceiling(0 0) > (if pixels pixel-width (ceiling pixel-width symbol-width)) > ... > Needless to say, an export process should not be anywise relying on the > value of buffer-text-pixel-size during bootstrap. We need this to calculate symbol width. Is it expected that `buffer-text-pixel-size' returns 0? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at