From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DONTCOMPILE in lisp/Makefile.in doesn't work. Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:25:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87pswzx9as.fsf@xs4all.nl> References: <873btxmjiz.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87sm1wzaz7.fsf@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113388500 14196 80.91.229.2 (13 Apr 2005 10:35:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 12:34:58 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLfCa-0005kL-5C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:34:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLen3-00028U-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLeeS-0001DV-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLeeL-0001Ar-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLeeK-00019L-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.28] (helo=smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLf4T-0000Ev-WE; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3DAPlEE053028; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:25:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DLf47-0005h4-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:25:47 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87sm1wzaz7.fsf@xs4all.nl> (Lute Kamstra's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:54:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 19 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35930 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35930 Lute Kamstra writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> Isn't it better to just do away with DONTCOMPILE and just rely on lisp >> files setting no-byte-compile? >> >> I think so. It would be simpler to use just one mechanism, >> and no-byte-compile is cleaner. Could you please do that, >> and put no-byte-compile into any files which could use it and >> don't have it? > > I'll do that. Done. I've changed lisp/Makefile.in and lisp/makefile.w32-in. They don't use DONTCOMPILE anymore. I've also changed make-dist because it looked for DONTCOMPILE in lisp/Makefile.in. Lute.