From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mem leak Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:44:37 +0900 Message-ID: <87psj72fu2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <34e52d434e5685.34e568534e52d4@net.lu.se> <87y7xv5qv7.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145889913 9546 80.91.229.2 (24 Apr 2006 14:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: LENNART BORGMAN , Romain Francoise , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 24 16:45:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FY2JB-0003mY-Rr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FY2JB-0003M2-Ea for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FY2J0-0003Ln-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FY2Iz-0003LU-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FY2Iy-0003LR-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:44:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.216.5.72] (helo=smtp02.dentaku.gol.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FY2LC-0003cX-JF; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from 203-216-96-138.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.96.138] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1FY2Io-0008Om-LM; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:44:38 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0222E2F49; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:44:37 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:24:59 -0400") Original-Lines: 17 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53339 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Overflow can happen because the .elc file is missing, and the > not-completely-functional Emacs that results is quite functional enough to > then byte-compile the file, so it makes bootstrapping easier. Hmmm, how hard would it be to have it runnable, but not _installable_ in such a case (for instance, if it retained the executable, but gave it another name, "emacs-non-pure" or something)? [I don't know whether it's easy to get the results of the failure in a form that make can easily use...] -Miles -- Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia