From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: We can use python.el Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 22:51:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87ps51qy5n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <873b22nd3f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iraxtzkm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87abw961jm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <5kfy61cxjl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4648211C.7080107@gnu.org> <87sl9zo3o3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87veeu6usj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179283755 28346 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2007 02:49:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 02:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 04:49:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ho9Zf-00051S-CU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 04:49:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho9hb-0005WU-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho9hX-0005SY-3P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho9hU-0005SM-O8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho9hU-0005SJ-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.19.1.138]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ho9ZV-0004vV-W9; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51BA04E7C4; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:51:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue\, 15 May 2007 21\:39\:27 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71136 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > People seemed to complain that your fix caused a disastrous problem. > > What is the state of that? Is the original bug fixed now? > > Is the subsequent bug fixed now? > > I'm still looking at it. > > What is the current state of the code in EMACS_22_BASE? Is the fix in or out? The fix is out.