From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:32:42 +0900 Message-ID: <87prssgacl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87wsn1fl72.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208157823 18023 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 07:23:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 09:24:11 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlJ2t-0005Ti-CE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:24:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlJ2F-0004lh-4d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlJ1w-0004gM-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlJ1v-0004fY-6Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlJ1u-0004fT-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlJ1q-0007qk-2Q; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlJ1l-0007XJ-RI; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:22:58 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652E61535AC; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:22:47 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C01071A29F3; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:32:42 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" 2785829fe37c XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95166 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe it is (I didn't yet have time to look at the code), but there > could be a good reason for that. If it's so easy to recognize the > BOM, why do we need versions with and without it? I don't know, in fact I think I think it's a bad idea. That's what the part of my message that you snipped was saying. But I'll have to defer to Handa-san on that.