From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bell Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:33:33 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87pr2l8mo2.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <4BA0CDF9.40707@online.de> <76682E4761EA432EB929E5E199B0F92A@us.oracle.com> <87wrxb57e1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20100317.200901.408057447.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <87sk7y2gh9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87bpelic8g.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <878w9ox1x4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d3z074fs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87tyscysm2.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87mxy23b3f.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <88262642C6164CD2872637E1309A66CB@us.oracle.com> <87iq8qikuu.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <874ojxddnw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269989142 24403 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2010 22:45:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 00:45:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwkBj-0006LA-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:45:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37414 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwkBj-0000S4-J8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:45:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwkAm-0008QR-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48284 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwkAi-0008Q4-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwkAg-00027r-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:32 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out1.starman.ee ([85.253.0.3]:39833 helo=mx1.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwkAg-00027i-MZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:30 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.68.10.cable.starman.ee [82.131.68.10]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749353F40A5; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:44:24 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:11:31 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122942 Archived-At: >> + (signal (car err) nil))) > > Is there a particular reason why you used nil rather than (cdr err) as > second argument? The only reason is that other line-oriented commands in simple.el call `signal' explicitly with the second arg nil like: (signal 'beginning-of-buffer nil) (signal 'end-of-buffer nil) If it's more reliable with (cdr err), I will add it. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/