From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] use tail pointer for LOOP Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 19:05:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87pr0dfhge.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4C018D79.7040409@censorshipresearch.org> <4C018FD3.1020305@censorshipresearch.org> <4C01AA28.6030002@censorshipresearch.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275240665 32450 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2010 17:31:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 17:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Geoff Gole , Emacs development discussions To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 30 19:31:04 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OImLi-0008Co-1Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 19:31:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38259 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIlyU-0001KC-Fa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59432 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIly5-0001Ev-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIlxZ-0004Eu-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:44889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIlxZ-0004Ea-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 13:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so350129fga.12 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GARII7A1lzBh//bIAMxlgLj7kT44WZylFj4mYItGBms=; b=oVJtfnw2WVyqvgfsLpvzCMFtU/fMrhjTpeX1yjCUDTBinkf1o3WqTeSxc1Fm2rdEGV QTTutbaodT0LIliozo+l/APlj0QCi9W7CEyrmvx8db3wSfPuTxkkSe+6xHrcfFiAfPlf eF21nu4KE4HyT9fUeynFRjSsa8bZhgD+cmrJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Of4nduKnEHBGuthC4Tiud1iuMx/w/EAPiIwwy0ERmx6AQ0I5vmDHOfnYgG2e7swN9E l+M1W/ztpAv21YN4HC1fmCQB1Y+cYTgU1OzYwJyqCwn6kDCRodtLKiOX2YoGnoOMdgcu oezvs8oQ9UrjOYrA6BhewgBKzBElBCV89KYOY= Original-Received: by 10.87.71.7 with SMTP id y7mr7163925fgk.63.1275239159252; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm6700422fkt.37.2010.05.30.10.05.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 30 May 2010 10:05:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C01AA28.6030002@censorshipresearch.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Sat, 29 May 2010 19:58:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125363 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione writes: > We do this only for the anonymous-variable case, but it's still an > improvement. > > --- > /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el > 2008-01-06 20:07:45.000000000 -0500 > +++ cl-macs2.el 2010-05-29 19:52:09.000000000 -0400 > - ((memq word '(nconc nconcing append appending)) > + ((memq word '(nconc noncing append appending)) [...] > + (let ((func (if (memq word '(nconc noncing)) [...] ??? If that's a typo (and I can hardly think about any other reason), then it's an interesting one, indeed. =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n