From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:07:38 -0500 Message-ID: <87pqrh3qjp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87aair7163.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871v3yt81v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296234561 695 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2011 17:09:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 28 18:09:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Piroy-0003e4-FO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:09:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Piroq-00023x-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54802 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiroU-0001Tf-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:08:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PirnP-0007Ca-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:07:40 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]:53462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PirnP-0007CU-Jw; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:07:39 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014130.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0SH7cGZ028323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:07:38 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3AFE71602C5; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:07:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <871v3yt81v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:18:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135158 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: >> Can we uncomment the #define NO_ARG_ARRAY line in src/s/intel386.h? >> We got rid of NO_ARG_ARRAY in emacs-24, that file is the only one that >> still enables it in 23.3. This is just a bug waiting to happen as >> compilers get smarter... I've just committed the suggested change to the branch.