From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:36:22 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87pqpg45o9.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87hbbc0zi6.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <83oc5gsdwc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ei6bunxz.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <83tyf6rhgn.fsf@gnu.org> <84zkoy6tah.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87hbb5a4xq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <84ipvkx1da.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87d3ls7n3b.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vczdwjuk.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87k4fr3koi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aagn2tpr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrjquacf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj05svwh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp11imgb.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <8739mc5nes.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300999043 14425 80.91.229.12 (24 Mar 2011 20:37:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:37:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 21:37:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2rH6-0008VO-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:37:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2rH1-000433-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50083 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2rGv-0003u5-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:36:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2rGm-0004KS-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2rGl-0004KI-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2rGk-0008K9-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:36:34 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:36:34 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:36:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IJRjf3/Rb7ps8kInvF/2ynp8AIc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137655 Archived-At: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:07:04 +0100 Robert Pluim wrote: RP> I've been getting uninterruptible hangs from Gnus with the previous RP> version of this patch, which I don't remember getting when using RP> external gnutls-cli processes. Is there something I can look at to RP> figure out why this is happening (I can run emacs under gdb if needed)? I'm surprised about the uninterruptible part. I use it daily. Can you try following the steps in (info "(emacs) Checklist") to generate a backtrace of the hang? You can use an Emacs bug report against the patch, just change the To address so it goes to me directly. RP> I can also update to this latest version of the patch if you think that RP> will make a difference. It may, for the better logging. The older (2011-03-23 and prior) versions printed a lot of EAGAIN messages. Ted