From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:17:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppza5jye.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83sj46z468.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362734284 12540 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 09:18:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lele@metapensiero.it, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 10:18:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtRZ-0004sE-LJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:18:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51578 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtRD-000716-P1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46923) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtR7-0006tw-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:18:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtR3-00066Y-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:37098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtQy-00064n-IZ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:17:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so2250503wgi.27 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:17:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=5Lsu0KwiynkXtKNM7Cnb4Vd/O3eAWHLJBEIFKk20OeQ=; b=QBjp5SFpMZp+a/53z/f8fxp+50oQRCgDunNJ8addVN/99Yup/fFx37krajFqjYpYoE oq+7vM9ZZjHdAqL/S0bs7H47hN3PXGcY1MLOviwdQU6QTP+qzH8iuxlrY6BsAPQFUIz/ GPprNHweabG+9hIUCBPMxUqwMXFSSOhDKMQCaUKOvYh1tSrxJ0ddGVtmvOIsNoZmgnIy i5MeLmt/WxC/LBLxumk45z269D5F93hChD0RxcbxYmANaeo3KFCXnNgid2WKHjdAQsLc VOYfDhyIELfYjmg3Ji42Qi16XrXt94WH8Yq9j59DbJcXQ5vc4uZOF37arsylOsq/MFGX Rjag== X-Received: by 10.194.82.34 with SMTP id f2mr2356446wjy.25.1362734267788; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:17:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex15sm38065263wid.5.2013.03.08.01.17.46 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:17:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 326AF1C218DA; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:17:45 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (joakim@verona.se's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:15:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.48 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157593 gmane.emacs.orgmode:67917 Archived-At: Hi Joakim, joakim@verona.se writes: > Just a small reminder of the idea Stefan sometimes drops in these > discussions: > - Emacs "trunk" could be stripped of all but the bare essentials to > achieve bootstrap. > - distribution tarballs could be made from trunk+elpa. > > Since I dont do releases for Emacs I dont get to have an opinion on the > matter, but if pressed, I would say this idea has considerable > merit. Thanks for reminding us of this idea, I clearly see the benefits. As long as Org is distributed in Emacs, I personally have no problem. -- Bastien