From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Copyright/Distribution questions (Emacs/Orgmode) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:42:35 +0900 Message-ID: <87ppz1ebno.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87ober717z.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9iwcp.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9fiu0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d2v4f5bb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87a9q7eynu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87y5dpeqoo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363308165 17958 80.91.229.3 (15 Mar 2013 00:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 15 01:43:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGIjl-0002G8-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 01:43:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGIjO-000130-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGIjK-00012k-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGIjG-0004Zn-6Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:47049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGIjF-0004Zd-Sk; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586F797086E; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:42:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EB351A3D97; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:42:35 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157879 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Ad hominem, Richard? That's usually beneath you. > > It is not an ad-hominem attack, it is criticism of what you are > saying. You dismissed the content of what I wrote, citing not the content, but an attribution of intent to me. That is, without doubt, argumentum ad hominem. Your attribution was also false. I am genuinely concerned that the FSF and I disagree over the scope of my assignments. I don't know if it matters enough to me to do something about it -- I'll have to think about that -- but I was shocked by the breadth of the claim that you seemed to be making.