From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing rollback from VC mode - request for comment Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:40:36 +0900 Message-ID: <87ppbmfg63.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <20141211092138.6D5F6C008E@snark.thyrsus.com> <20141211123629.GA25499@thyrsus.com> <83fvcmtax5.fsf@gnu.org> <20141211170959.GA581@thyrsus.com> <874mt1hg5j.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418568072 18270 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2014 14:41:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Steinar Bang Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 14 15:41:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0AM4-00061j-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:41:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0AM4-0003zE-Ef for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0ALl-0003y9-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:40:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0ALe-0007xW-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:40:44 -0500 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:48302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0ALe-0007xN-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:40:38 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7A91C3881; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:40:36 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB8AA1A2CFC; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:40:36 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180085 Archived-At: Steinar Bang writes: > >>>>> "Stephen J. Turnbull" : > > > AFAICT, hg's rollback command, while it will destructively strip a > > commit (to preserve the commit as a bundle, hg provides the > > intuitively named "hg strip"), > > Huh...? Do you really mean to say that > git reset HEAD~1 > or > git reset --hard HEAD~1 > isn't safe (especially the last one), and intuitive...? I don't see where I said anything about git at all. I was discussing hg. The only thing in git that destroys commits AFAIK is git-gc.