From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Severe lossage from unread-command-events Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:56:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87pp2vf5f9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87egjh4u1h.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83pp30sd5l.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2t831gf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871tfgl0e2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wpx8jigl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439225845 28916 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2015 16:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 18:57:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqNn-0001pi-M8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:57:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqNn-0002oO-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqNj-0002lB-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqNi-0004Ho-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqNi-0004Hk-BM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39625 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqNg-0008KW-EU; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0DD6DF35F; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:56:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wpx8jigl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:00:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188691 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Looks like I can (and must) leave off the (cons t ...) for my use > case. I haven't seen any bad effects from doing so: events are looked > up in keymaps and recorded just fine so far. I don't know what the > implications of the t thing are. But other than that, things do look > good so far. Any chance for this patch going in anytime soon? Anything I should be doing here? -- David Kastrup