From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib? Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:13:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87pp0xgv6n.fsf@petton.fr> References: <560E0DA7.6080305@dancol.org> <87twq9ebmh.fsf@udel.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443804209 20753 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 16:43:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:43:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Mark Oteiza , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 18:43:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi3QP-0004oE-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:43:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi3QO-000736-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi21q-0002U3-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi21m-0003dd-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:39162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi21m-0003c9-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BED920099 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:13:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:13:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=6a1un3c0EK1v/TqWA6eRhN1xMBw=; b=AcE7G aAGvsCTiesJnrY1hPtk/ZC+XRb8/7BRTqJV6kHgTy5iJtpMzCQ/AAH4X/yCuLjI9 SAQeDBpFUamnMWUHSsrmdRHQTFD+HjxtgaK1kfcD9F8LRy48k28INTwF0BJfZsb8 b2K+hIKC7RtpGuioiNl+5k2A28OJbPTKNWEiaw= X-Sasl-enc: OSgdL9LnUmO6jqf6heX2CXtyWonuRLuP1CLpOB1lSps9 1443798820 Original-Received: from blueberry (arennes-658-1-161-3.w2-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [2.14.2.3]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 728C2C00022; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:13:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87twq9ebmh.fsf@udel.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.6 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190711 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mark Oteiza writes: > Daniel Colascione writes: > >> Commit d605a539d4863c7e7c66aaea6e538ae14c47f3d7 broke Emacs when winner >> was enabled without cl-lib being loaded. Nobody seems to have noticed >> until now, which suggests that either almost nobody uses winner, or >> almost everybody has cl-lib loaded anyway. Maybe it's time to just dump >> cl-lib with Emacs. > > Bug#21549 > > I'd be happy to have more useful functions in "core". (Can we have > `filter` yet?) It's not in "core", it's not preloaded, but seq.el provides useful additional sequence-manipulation functions such as `seq-filter'. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWDp8gAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQFlcH+wZJ7817WYjpS4fM+1z3DkSZ n+IcDipnh6U2eC/gAora1xyGPzqDO7Xsaq1IovFM2e97rFPD4hu+w6pZju0ScIEg v6/nrR+565U76omxUQm1LBAV3bcNyqpzZoStzCFYyUJ01J3u74h0Kn3H5TYQSmxC cobsSTp/37PERaKrNqBaJJcRNNZu33cJ/kBKF5ldSC+R9yz14RzcUpCESMsWE44Q odCjPg5UZ9zTT4oXh0W+wYZNEIUH1pPAHwdRJUlXdA38GPMQHiywfk7ZdNTTLNJP LtrTAXnLNuZqegD8frGB3Xdiy5JRgo0+/wQMY/GEs4K4cCkSOBXrrM8/G2pdopU= =Y3CU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--