From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.cedet,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87pp05h7rj.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> References: <83wpum3ozk.fsf@gnu.org> <87si59ln6u.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <56224B63.3010803@yandex.ru> <562592ED.1070104@siege-engine.com> <56262577.70107@yandex.ru> <562702C2.6070505@gmail.com> <56276ECE.3090508@yandex.ru> <56281747.9050305@gmail.com> <20151023113318.GA14031@whiterain> <87twphhbxx.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <20151023155101.GA5071@whiterain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445617564 1742 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 16:26:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Wiegley , Eric Ludlam , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eric Ludlam , cedet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Evgeniy Dushistov Original-X-From: cedet-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Fri Oct 23 18:25:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: sf-cedet-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.sourceforge.net ([216.34.181.88]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpf9y-0004JW-ED for sf-cedet-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:25:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpf9q-0008PD-Qc; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:25:34 +0000 Original-Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpf9p-0008P8-GV for cedet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:25:33 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of randomsample.de designates 5.45.97.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=5.45.97.173; envelope-from=deng@randomsample.de; helo=randomsample.de; Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Zpf9o-0004jR-0E for cedet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:25:33 +0000 Original-Received: from ip4d1645ea.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.22.69.234] helo=isaac.fritz.box) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpf9e-0007XA-5p; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:25:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20151023155101.GA5071@whiterain> (Evgeniy Dushistov's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:51:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1Zpf9o-0004jR-0E X-BeenThere: cedet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussions for CEDET projects List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cedet-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.cedet:7281 gmane.emacs.devel:192505 Archived-At: Evgeniy Dushistov writes: > Because of clang's python API just part of C/C++ API, > then it should be possible in rtags to have access to AST. You are right, the stuff that is available through libclang could be exported as Semantic tags. But last I checked lots of stuff was not accessible through libclang as it was only exported as so called "unexposed statements". -David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------