From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vitalie Spinu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] widen-limits c331b66: Implement buffer-widen-limits functionality Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87poukn8pl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160322022539.16038.77264@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <8737riqouj.fsf@gmail.com> <221845e0-b194-433e-bfbc-105272ae5752@default> <87twjyp21k.fsf@gmail.com> <56F242E0.7060004@online.de> <877fgtpfrw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F293E7.2000703@online.de> <87a8lpnusg.fsf@gmail.com> <83r3f12oo5.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2D156.9040401@online.de> <83k2kt2i51.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2E643.4060903@online.de> <592bbafa-76ae-49d9-b5cd-644b3619a0d8@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458771259 22932 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2016 22:14:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 23:14:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1air2Z-0001Pb-TI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:14:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1air2Y-0004io-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1air2V-0004ii-EK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1air2U-00054D-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:37311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1air2O-00053m-Ie; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:14:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p65so42137416wmp.0; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=luDXrTutY+LVRXETFfF5mr8Tp8Uvvzfr/NT872jnnaU=; b=GxFW+9OJMeR17EYnUsfONKkQCU2oRGT8YU/ggc/ecWh2BVwNNdCGjSENWZqqrtG2sE oWoj3Ne0aZhD2ZFytfomGlXxeHxciV10SZhapQdoOb0toLLdS1iXouMiQX3WNA0CxIlk OEmhGezd8u6W/3/PXRijBk7ORXEyHvsTnzJlspnF0WPFdwhIREy9thSe8Ro/15wsBGEs liZbojCG5CFy+erG0xYpgouS/j+RYMxjLTppLI8B3QAnOwzLj9isD281FsgXXJW6dqH0 YvSsoiXXU0Loc8NcBvT9QcL5oM4RzSAawvnxAnAQTgkyaL/yYb3uq8woB7rvaJJ2ZyrE jqSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=luDXrTutY+LVRXETFfF5mr8Tp8Uvvzfr/NT872jnnaU=; b=cxCUXk03aXB0rgkvfrweLL3X+nB5wC0iq5X5gxoYXf1f+dM4Jhx2FasGE9QDob28z5 ynkZ/obXYxmzX98QyDfX95/aX5LERW+xd72hYoW2t89EINLLogUmfRjO5/A91ESmmcfI zjKZG9IqoSsNN/qtyHWR4HziqbnYft5HDmJc25pavDYi4oouCIcvV8VEIGW6Zdsji14j tfKujyStjvyEHXqZ2vJM8UhEumM9Y1Tt0cCNgMDDD6Wv2y5AIlwbH7t5mHb1BjBIzZqb gnnqiBdnA5rH/QgOqTdKHyxWgnPxMyDNSUTAnefX+UZp/qtbGxX72QTYf8NQYkc4fpmC WQzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKyCGvFY3dpLleZ5yfKZ5lEv4wRsHWK6rneMs6yS/Qbgjhzti+4xwIb5yeHBil6GA== X-Received: by 10.28.150.19 with SMTP id y19mr29723727wmd.56.1458771239484; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([143.176.214.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7sm4500476wjf.39.2016.03.23.15.13.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:13:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <592bbafa-76ae-49d9-b5cd-644b3619a0d8@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:57:49 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202151 Archived-At: >> On Wed, Mar 23 2016 14:57, Drew Adams wrote: > It looks like someone perhaps implemented something and just tossed > some minimal doc into the manual, in the form of doc-string-like text > for a couple functions. The issue of prog-widen and prog-indentation-context was discussed extensively in the thread that led to this diff. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-03/threads.html#00859 Too long to be read from scratch I suppose. My takeaway is that those features are raw and simplistic and bring more complications than they solve. Hopefully there will be a common consensus to put those on hold for now. Vitalie