From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-state and unregistered Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:45:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87potfuqdt.fsf@gmx.de> References: <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru> <87oa9dzgl0.fsf@gmx.de> <87potshczh.fsf@gmx.de> <87bn57otja.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <515b3451-820d-ad50-8c98-d0330a0f4266@yandex.ru> <87lh4arpbg.fsf@gmx.de> <87ega2rodp.fsf@gmx.de> <87vb37ury1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461501965 10722 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2016 12:46:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 14:45:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1auJQC-0002Xl-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:45:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJQB-0004KD-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:45:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJPy-0004IP-Hm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:45:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJPt-00027l-Iu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:45:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:51177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJPt-00027h-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([79.195.30.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfjlS-1bW3jp0Mp8-00pLDP; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:45:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:21:52 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KTzabFlRwLCPFVwqYLrhZE+MP1URaL9uaKZRzQkZ38G6qzamAhd u0wqcjaPYZHJSpmkAduurIxOseEDHhfqfEshVZy+9wSJhG186Yw54CvwITi+rTCa4Fh0Ziq TuC1Yn2cP1AZXX1wT7Wid1ErXuEsJVlr7Oo7j65wdW9HJDBnhFrfqfSnx3nrDuK5ZXjAtrz iPC1XP6HDk2BNbJsNCZPA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zOAdt56xpk4=:XoMew3q3puqk77qXqaN18l kjHK+Juaa1iI2GPDWYmId813o3Xh2DVsefmINYH8UdeJOl+B5sjaCx7jslBDEgnfeRM+zC5ic YIG2oozueRvWmOllikAq6Ws8wMrdPeoRy+H9ba1b8RRq71W5A4py9YThcQELAdh5iewI1LyAF Et1ZX06rtftL0jZSMrfNFjnbM/Yt7ihUHAlP663ksmxopKva2odDZ2y5rvAX74WwMXoArDcYW P4alQwLDezNyzdPFsnzxMSME3JOuQHndg+OpljJYDg3hvl1Mcdv0EsTv/r9bkkG8+/bzS9FAZ Qguv7idGjft6pWRGaaeUmHlcvzoFeKjN+PMqyXm+8GILrnFlGn9l4R2VHfxU+ROPDFH8qTVNv ZgUO/V4xyWlwS+6AEDiOTetNK2hWTUp/d/hMx1wt+b8YXy61/Q9kaEvojmJsmChDL6No4NPP1 IeBm0VYZ7rfr05TjRtLHfOv/SJ84mXaoMHlZH6wqwYRtt6JWB+xpTl7uAhOH0WYVXlYlb3zbk q2xE5SSV87eSgnlrGyuf+iIULf72Dm03H1gdCmvhHJBysXygW71lakFBU+BDxfb9Zxkelrlik y5HSirGV4rvvVIdD8HQp2jJodKUBzdij6w6ZhHo4T9HjPASWxg1piQF/aSKZvWNlSkDxrUDWo RJ/+FpUQEXYpJ1Gqc5GljQj+B66uXsjDa8JwxfX4tJvMH691UAmp8GMqBl9PsteVKvwGWdXJR cSU8XMtVpNw2CirmIDNVBV9FKl1sWTFxWoQYs5Z3WJpVfm7r7GAWtBaI+H/zhMQMvbBNNyl2 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203245 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > The actual behavior will not change. This is what I'm proposing: to > put the current behavior of (vc-state FILE) into spec. Sometimes it returns nil, sometimes unregistered. Is this really what we want to offer as a spec? I'm going to push my changes accumulated over the last weeks. You will see by the comments in vc-test--state, that the situation has been improved. Less FIXME comments. I'm not saying that I'm satisfied already ... We still need to check the performance, as said by you (due to external processes). Best regards, Michael.