From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:13:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87pom8bn7q.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com> <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ins2jq88.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg2p8swx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831sypjmst.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478448932 29042 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2016 16:15:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 16:15:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 06 17:15:28 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Q69-0005DX-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:15:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44693 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Q6C-0000YF-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:15:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Q5e-0000Y8-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Q5Z-0002Lk-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:14:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=52263 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Q5Z-0002Kp-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:14:33 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Q5C-0006mZ-3S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:14:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:PwQbrIt6mNVsPbqRnYXes+H/IYk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209210 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Besides, at this point it borders on technical malpractice to suggest >> to users that it's OK to use Windows 9x to run Emacs. > > How can this be a malpractice, technical or otherwise? Windows 9X is a virus magnet and reservoir. This is bad for the user of that machine and for everyone else on the 'net. That's the technical part. The moral part needs not to be mentioned on this list. I wholeheartedly agree with Paul on his response.