From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pretty printing frames from *Backtrace* Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:22:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87poln7fwz.fsf@web.de> References: <877f80i1sd.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479824584 15857 195.159.176.226 (22 Nov 2016 14:23:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:23:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 15:22:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9ByG-0001Iz-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:22:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9ByG-0007Bc-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9ByA-0007BV-Up for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:22:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9By7-0001Fx-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:22:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:57020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9By7-0001FW-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.1.77]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0McFTf-1cQRjr0ACt-00Jc2i; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:22:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel"'s message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:28:16 -0500") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8y5lK6bbLY6Ie+Jpb1i8nTQxf+4OmaBG534NmP1e1sv9A5Cqbt7 260UkpEKypNFD5C6YphhUKgyY7XCnc701YNdqBU7Y1Q5werZBGydkk3zz+8N2B2SOQksLnV WVNe3dL0md1rqFKxJQA4k8R6qCqxKlwqtf4lEQmLapFK5NCCFjVl70SIu5jYIzlmjnIOjKa 96dc1mAAbU+2xinGp45kw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8ky+pPQ7CO4=:COmAPmcq/Gu7bup/hwp9t0 V0Prdngn/EXRW9PWQcY9KnSviWMz2AeGF7mOV8+cTr2+4DN+ltkZinkdGsqLE+G/dj7PNzcxi GK+uHA+YN6Dhxi/2HCopvlHfr3PkrBClZ5dLYlJRJKxvY1OJmVwiiJRf6nBdkoRE0ImAhU3O3 YS3e2A6Dx9F7GdTZAM2PndZZECIQKNja7aSsV93WX6ctEZB7vEYcDXl0uiC5Rie23VIsIudRE /qxFgmiQTyanosPOVe69j9trpTQyF5uHjgAJbpvWDiQyQEAP6uMB0aQLBsq/8bKHf0MuHvo1f X7SOIHZuS8YRtw/hbHdZ8RwxnGl43Q61EvANDHVkvEyu2VvSDF5jo7NaiKecfhnzV4GTOYwfI 97h25uw0s9pBV1xXST4ucCvi06jMCbBRa5iHUG2Fx/p7p7BmSfkd6BvFO66Dlk5mlM8JuomSM oRDT5ghhNs9Qi1cF/P/VvckNjYRp0oW/Vi++4iZCE7yregnd0263WMtTMOBiEB0/warPdzzvv k+Nj77d6mtOAKKRPhokYCYpJefU3NLZ0oCxqAY+nWBFLOMZ0I3d3bhI4c/3H1cPOCb/hDpoe7 P79mS3nBzgTxD7cm+YCEo7YfMQKxikjqSR4E9PWCrO4OBGyBQlEddKNPuOHGOBmtNxohkW+Gj BVdTcijxHgLUZQQXAMGtxBKTxK0BJuObRtBGeA9rHeIFic5bVPN5QjceqCbXLhwP+7+6zATQY cKKVuU0MES7511gq+bSSjEXuvRgycgUPZT6JIm3rP1yLC2ObHkQc/MG5odSScqNmAzat24ZG X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.11 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209545 Archived-At: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel writes: > On 2016-11-21 18:31, Noam Postavsky wrote: > > Ah, if you can reuse the debugger's counting that's okay. I still > > think this would be better as an integrated feature of the debugger > > though. [...] having this feature really looks like a bare minimum to > > me, not an addon. > > +1; Michael, the features you described sound like they would make > very nice additions to the core `debug'! So, should I create a patch against debug.el of master? I don't speak C, so everything I have to offer will be Elisp. Regards, Michael.