From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] timer-list -> list-timers? Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:34:56 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87poale8vj.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87zi9u1xx7.fsf@udel.edu> <83vakik2ad.fsf@gnu.org> <874ls21ngq.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505923413 31765 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2017 16:03:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:03:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 20 18:03:26 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duhTB-0007qO-OR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:03:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duhTJ-0002M1-3r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dug5r-0005oe-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:35:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dug5i-0004lj-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=46942 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dug5h-0004lI-U1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dug5Y-0006Lv-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:34:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:47BX2hZWSfYV6pIZ/BctlxT1av8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218586 Archived-At: On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:56:53 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> I guess I was just adhering to the `-function' naming LI> convention. I'm all for renaming it to `list-timers'. That kind of bugs me about `M-x list-packages' etc. (there's a whole bunch of them, like `list-holidays' and so on). Is there any rule about when to make an exception to the `-function' naming convention? If not, should there be one? Ted