From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Flymake refactored Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 18:48:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87po9y29bm.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87h8vmj3tr.fsf@lolita> <1507138648.1972.0@smtp.gmail.com> <874lre2von.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv566yjx.fsf@udel.edu> <87shex276r.fsf@gmail.com> <87efqh2sud.fsf@udel.edu> <877ew919hd.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvzb1nae.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507394936 8350 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2017 16:48:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 16:48:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 27.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 18:48:51 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0sHS-0001T8-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 18:48:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0sHa-0001XM-9a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 12:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0sHM-0001Vn-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 12:48:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0sHA-0008T1-Mc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 12:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:38457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0sHA-0008SV-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 12:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1C3E6B97; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:48:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ttmPP_hGaVn; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78307E6707; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:48:19 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219228 Archived-At: On 2017-10-07, at 15:37, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Similarly the LaTeX backend would naturally fit in tex-mode.el. >> Please no. What about AUCTeX users? > > AUCTeX can (require 'tex-mode) and then use that function. > > AUCTeX and tex-mode should share more code anyway (IIUC they already > share font-lock rules, at least to the extent that you can use tex-mode > font-lock rules in AUCTeX, tho AUCTeX also comes with its own font-lock > rules that you can use instead). OK, I didn't know that. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski