From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Branch freezing for release Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:59:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnpt4x0d.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> <87mukyiczg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <4CAA6D9F-0402-489C-8DD1-CE2ADBAA42C9@gnu.org> <87tvf69r16.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <4C62647A-5A71-4C82-9D37-ED933023AFC0@gnu.org> <83pnpt6cf9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="209423"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, Noam Postavsky , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 18:59:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGZT-000sDL-J5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:59:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGZS-0007qT-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGZL-0007qM-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGZH-0002vy-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]:33500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGZD-0002rO-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id d55so1895618ede.0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=9wjk75hIni9OJUyYFqSZwEO4mU3lYuRSC4efYjc0hBE=; b=N5Xp/P1ghFXIYRW+Yq66aMkInzZ7KhFeNxQRngHtUbChLqBurXKpil0i06G+uRyasW KXMPxKzh0NygJseILBTOs0YZKb2yFBkHghzhrwVYwQqIrXn5HJyFPv1Zv2R5rlTME8yF AkUMth58qmXoA5pT8s+4qEZefFyFE9fwk/OVuDweTOKZWOTTcqfP6wYW0pCFO03P3JTy x4wfgH0tYtNeUA1vJ6gtRTYuIWzKUPpwO61HPnFnebVIBj8WyrzAi9WzbVWM+k7WmZ4b EAdtRDZC0wC+5X/VnJdUIgBk1+kb9Ir5HkQsG5cG0SN+CEqsA2KB1I1+DXFqhJdT1Tv2 ja3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=9wjk75hIni9OJUyYFqSZwEO4mU3lYuRSC4efYjc0hBE=; b=eDfrgmX5RczzLS2kGrIiuD6aBwUYSirg+bA7gzFDL4MYmId3uA3rvmbjCP8ggU/ctD rbWM/kbQ5a2wqkKL9Xc8COAbHpnsDhrE4hJbziBMkOTQ7IAu84lHQUXuFv3BI3nQmj9V bQK6mek+PHNLjHthtTa6qX8TciEhFvSbAsFX9NNfROg45Oh+G8WnG2XFL9RCtTxHSERo sEnhQcBJ3EcnrQDHCKltTR1jr7Uv6zdTwTsNrlvOrktCYC9RadGXUbRUtZaZbmOJwUIP 8F9VSpglANfBKWbFytwNM+PMoUx9G9OjjqkgcU0stMgwZo/xW+/eRwDYLx4kjsamAUs6 YinA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXW/nUiz7ULfU2bUkAUsLmhtlIEna8CRBv3gcH9j7O9+FU9QeZg JKYr0GwmXu7yI+4X5rs52172aA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZQswCp7UU7RIKO0nVXKtaKWH28GmyLn6quQg2N8YQ45SGxsDefEgkPg+JTiApjCHIxu/C/g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4bd6:: with SMTP id x22mr11472762ejv.234.1554915556527; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([83.70.200.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm10445280edp.4.2019.04.10.09.59.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83pnpt6cf9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:40:58 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::52a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235229 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:16:35 -0400 >> Cc: Emacs developers , Eric Abrahamsen >> >> > > I don't see anything there about not pushing after an RC is made >> >> > There's no need to say anything else, since an RC should be tarred after all >> > its changes are pushed and tagged. That didn't happen this time by omission. >> > We all make mistakes at times. >> >> Ah, I had initially thought you meant the unfortunate mistake was on >> part of the person/people pushing to emacs-26 after the RC. > > If just one of these two things happened -- either they asked whether > it was okay to push, or the RC was pushed and tagged -- we'd be okay, > but none of them happened. Just to be clear: is it okay to push/backport fixes to emacs-26 again? I've noted the following commits as candidates for backporting: [1: 10cd65878c]: Update documentation for indent-relative functions 2019-04-05 19:48:21 -0500 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=10cd65878c741d2a22a1f2c36c54fcad4e516f72 [2: 0e468a6204]: Avoid using obsolete indent-relative-maybe 2019-04-03 17:55:40 +0100 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=0e468a620458fecd003c396050aa6deb722982c1 [3: 690c678fb6]: Fix comment-empty-lines docstring (bug#35152) 2019-04-04 23:41:02 +0100 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=690c678fb6c1fb5b2f828f9bb90782bd0b01c399 N.B.: Commit [2] also includes small code changes, not just docfixes. Thanks, -- Basil