Re: Add support for base64url variant

[Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>]

Stefan Monnier writes:
>> Base32url is useful for use on case-insensitive filesystems or
>> with case-insensitive protocols.
>
> That's what it's designed for, yes, but I can't think of any example
> where that's useful.  E.g. for case-insensitive filenames, using a hash
> instead of a base32 encoding was a better option in all the cases I've
> encountered because I only needed "one-way" and it conveniently bounds
> the max file name length.

I've used it for sharding into a blobstore on NTFS/SMB (two characters
for first level, so tree width of 1024).  The key is indeed a hash
(SHA512), so the probability of a collision would be low enough to just
ignore the case (for only 512 wide tree), but it felt cleaner to encode
via base32url instead.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra