From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?R8O2a3R1xJ8=?= Kayaalp Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing line widths in the Emacs source code Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:17:48 +0300 Message-ID: <87pn6psfqr.fsf@gkayaalp.com> References: <87tuw1x016.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8m9k7gu.fsf@telefonica.net> <86a6xta74d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24768"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 28.0.50 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 13 20:18:35 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHWaB-0006K2-R2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:18:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48096 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHWaA-0004xP-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:18:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHWZX-0004W4-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:17:55 -0400 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:42065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHWZW-0000Nh-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:17:55 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 31.177.204.112 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [31.177.204.112]) (Authenticated sender: self@gkayaalp.com) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A9D8FF802 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:17:49 +0000 (UTC) In-reply-to: <86a6xta74d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Received-SPF: none client-ip=217.70.183.199; envelope-from=self@gkayaalp.com; helo=relay9-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/13 14:17:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255551 Archived-At: On 2020-09-13 21:01 +03, Stephen Leake wro= te: > The counter argument is that wider lines make it easier to use longer, > more descriptive names; 'ada-goto-declaration-start' vs > 'ada-to-decl-st', for example. 80 char shouldn=E2=80=99t be a bottleneck for that, given Lisp lends itself= well to breaking up statements over lines in a bit more extreme fashion than what other syntaxes allow before becoming unreadable. IDK how popular it is but I like breaking things up over lines even if names are in the smaller range. -- =C4=B0. G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F Kayaalp / @cadadr / pgp: 024C 30DD 597D 142B 49AC 40EB 465C D949 B101 2427