Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> Perhaps, the intent of this patch was just to fix the currently broken >> behaviour suggested by epa-keyserver's type. >> >> I am not sure if a :set function could be used to randomize the >> keyserver for every request. Then again, is might not even really be >> necessary to provide such a feature. > > I wonder whether it might make sense instead to allow `epa-keyserver' to > be a list, and if so, then choose a random server from that list. > That'd give users control over what servers to use when randomising. That does seem to be a better approach, how does the patch below look like? -- Philip K.