From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [feature/rcirc-update] Reconnects don't seem to work anymore Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 21:49:30 +0000 Message-ID: <87pmwmx0gl.fsf@posteo.net> References: <871r98af1n.fsf@gnu.org> <877dj0wtwr.fsf@posteo.net> <87y2bg8y0k.fsf@gnu.org> <871r938u3v.fsf@gnu.org> <8735tjxft7.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgvqykkv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16349"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 15 23:50:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltGxE-00045S-Mj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:50:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltGxC-0001r6-Mz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:50:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltGwF-00012b-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:49:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltGwB-0003gT-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:49:39 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 199762400E5 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:49:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1623793772; bh=wJwMcv4OTCnML6u21SWqzT2QSkA5n98jU8BbjkOICHk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=ZCsloSPshA8hxpqY5IYULoTf5AxxjqmLfpETRkn3nAPTdoHpINbSk566P6prX6l8u zoBZvPWEuLEKGCMVLYj7Zdsrfi8Dw6gNMZ+S6uReydET5cX1Q37y1lNIcbWosM2n/F sH2hHcZFemxCBZPpQu/RQa2Ietu6lqCPkrknNPugrBA67W3atcYsOWqQCQdz+y0T6N iCqbXVZquy8pBRDdkj9dsM1QFcUjcbyLffsnUIYEiPo7kjR2Cpv19vkzO+4mfBGKew RBpPkC2udR6KEgnFCT9w/cYe55YZ0N4jILZsbGat7Hu/bteyhgWJ4TTwH9Vsbg4iZl EEM25ZgDde8hg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4G4MRH4SxGz6tmD; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <87zgvqykkv.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:39:08 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270828 Archived-At: Hi, Tassilo Horn writes: > I'm on fd96e3a0d9. I've just pulled again and 8 new commits appeared, > the oldest being from 5 days ago. I'm pretty confident I've pulled at > least every other day in order to see if there's something new. Did you > forget to push? No, that was not the issue, I just wanted to make sure > Anyway, I've updated to the current branch HEAD and restarted my > rcirc-emacs. > >>> 06:58 -*.freenode.net- *** You are connected to chat.freenode.net using TLS >>> (SSL) cipher 'TLSv1.3-TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384' >>> 06:58 !!! "@msgid=446~1623712485~22272;inspircd.org/service;inspircd.org/bot >>> :NickServ!services@services.freenode.net NOTICE tsdh :Nick tsdh >>> isn't registered." (wrong-type-argument arrayp nil) >> >> From your other message, it seems like this is specificity related to >> freenode, right? > > Yes, only freenode and only since today with no changes on rcirc in the > meantime. When I do > > /msg nickserv help > > in the *chat.freenode.org* buffer, I get the response > > 20:42 *** 401 n No such nick > > and in the buffer N@chat.freenode.org there is > > 20:42 ickserv help This was an issue caused by the new rcirc-define-command macro. The intention was to improve defun-rcirc-command by adding integrated argument parsing, and in this case, the regular expression was nor correctly generated, as it did not require at least one whitespace between arguments. I hope the last commits have fixes those issues, but I might have to rethink some more fundamental things about how that macro works. > So now that user N has my nickserv password and I can't change it > because freenode seems broken... > > I've asked on #help and the answers are: > > 1. I should use "/ns IDENTIFY password" instead of "/msg NickServ". > 2. I should look into using SASL for identificiation. Part of the IRCv3 improvements should also include this. > 3. "/quote nickserv identify password" also gives an > (wrong-type-argument arrayp nil) error but finally told be that > tsdh is not a registered nick. > > And then I was told that the original freenode with its user database is > now on classic.freenode.org and irc.freenode.org is something set up > completely anew without the previous data... > > I was also told that "/msg foobar text" only works if the user foobar is > online. If not, it'll select the first online user whose nick is a > prefix of foobar and send the remainder as message. (That's why the > user N received my NickServ IDENTIFY message.) > > I've just tried "/msg totototoXXX this is a test" on libera.chat and > it's the same there. The user t received a message "otototoXXX this is > a test". :-( > > So it would make sense that rcirc checked if there is an online user > NickServ before sending the IDENTIFY message to prevent password leakage > to random users as has happended to me. > > Bye, > Tassilo -- Philip K.