From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmtpvgva.fsf@gnus.org> References: <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <01341bd6-b94b-4f94-1461-405e723142ad@yandex.ru> <8735qmjklm.fsf@localhost> <87ilzi86h7.fsf@posteo.net> <875yvh9anq.fsf@posteo.net> <83o899yjh2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0jxyhbn.fsf@gnu.org> <05217332-4d76-83a6-06a6-3ddae942dd12@yandex.ru> <83czppygiv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgst7njp.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14879"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, lokedhs@gmail.com, yantar92@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 17:07:58 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMAnO-0003by-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:07:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMAnM-0006qm-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMAle-0005oU-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:48994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMAld-0008JA-8j; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:06:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gXOhrjuNsmRPS0UGWuZPHDpsxbntNf8/qspgy2DknpQ=; b=QZSEu8yggAG3GfoShYV0FtflkD l7kCUEMEHjO9VkIrzj1keHWO3La/ByFfcHcinlicwU6DsstxupK7gPf/boMRHqyOOJorN30XF1zDY MXuaBhUdHjRe5G8u7BbsFQxF5fvxlkxPNR7KDKUFUXs9zbaRHFDdDzEMqbIqxGr/8W8o=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMAlW-0006Fg-9q; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:06:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zgst7njp.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:15:38 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273800 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > If it were possible for the former to fix how they want the defaults to > be by adding something like > > (load-theme 'emacs-27) > > to their init, they wouldn't have to fight against every minor change, > while at the same time making it easier to argue for incremental changes > for the other users. Yes, I can certainly see that as a possible good feature. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no