From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Vigouroux via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pcase map binding form expansion failure on Emacs 27 only Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:20:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmtixobn.fsf@laposte.net> References: <87eea0610n.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87o8932p2x.fsf@laposte.net> <87wnnr3zw6.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87fsufdneq.fsf@laposte.net> <87pmti52ez.fsf@alphapapa.net> Reply-To: Kevin Vigouroux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26030"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 09 08:26:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mODW3-0006aE-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:26:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODW2-00080x-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODVK-0007IU-3k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-outgoing-1802.laposte.net ([160.92.124.103]:33142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODVH-0005F8-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:25:45 -0400 X-mail-filterd: {"version":"1.3.1", "queueID":"4H4plJ6vb8z16HmJ", "contextId":"a73d90ee-63c7-4090-8526-fb22026fb77a"} Original-Received: from outgoing-mail.laposte.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpnf0105.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4H4plJ6vb8z16HmJ for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:20:12 +0200 (CEST) X-mail-filterd: {"version":"1.3.1", "queueID":"4H4plJ5g56z16Hmd", "contextId":"bb8ebf72-13a3-4c33-95f2-4a7d64e686ff"} X-lpn-mailing: LEGIT X-lpn-spamrating: 50 X-lpn-spamlevel: not-spam X-lpn-spamcause: OK, (0)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudefkedguddtiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgpdfqfgfvpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghvihhnucggihhgohhurhhouhiguceokhgvrdhvihhgohhurhhouhigsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgueelheevuefgieduueehvdeifeffjeefueekffdtfeetvedugeetlefgffetjeenucfkphepuddtledrvddukedrudeftddrieehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddtledrvddukedrudeftddrieehpdhhvghloheprghrrghgohhgpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepkhgvrdhvihhgohhurhhouhigsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepvghmrggtshdquggvvhgvlhesghhnuhdrohhrgh Original-Received: from aragog (arennes-653-1-291-65.w109-218.abo.wanadoo.fr [109.218.130.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mlpnf0105.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA id 4H4plJ5g56z16Hmd for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:20:12 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87pmti52ez.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:48:36 -0500") DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=lpn-wlmd; t=1631168739; bh=cdZbAWbu5ckLdaxY7YHHVVmbyHMtl2WexHxGV98pb/o=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T2sexM3/ZwNnfC48gEdNzAUsrcnGFhd8L51qQzoV3kGBBPOBise56TmIkhBnT3iPv4oSiT4UITjPO2B92t6sKWeOEGT3709BppmgTHCxUVv8WItSMgBGUalz+RHXinqyuLw50KeR8AHGbRx3nB7NCnyUIAZzFV5XYc35U8qbgyoiqo52BdcNmizJHcZykT/TgkImxbi076C7Is2U4yHlaHW0uaWw8MSdrW3siREwlDze0CZXdLHDlBKFE+Eco4Q63tkkqcPXi24ab1A9eXKRGPSLszek7xla0siTJaanb945nh1pG0TvECB79fDEf9ckXvbYOkU20kYQxKoD+BGMkw==; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=160.92.124.103; envelope-from=ke.vigouroux@laposte.net; helo=smtp-outgoing-1802.laposte.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274425 Archived-At: Adam Porter writes: > So there seems to be a discrepancy between the version of the library > returned by `locate-library' and the version of the activated package, > and the version *actually* loaded into Emacs. Installing newer versions > of core libraries from ELPA doesn't seem to work, or at least not > reliably, on Emacs 27. But on Emacs 26.3 and Emacs 28.0.50, it seems to > work--for me, anyway. > > Is this a bug in Emacs 27, or am I misunderstanding something? I > thought the point of having newer versions of these core libs on ELPA > was that they could be used in older--or current--Emacs versions, but > this doesn't seem to be working reliably. > You should file a bug report. It is unclear if a built-in package should be updated because there are potentially competing indications (or contradictory). Look at bug#40971: Updating built-in packages that seq depends on is broken due to a bug in package.el -- Best regards, Kevin Vigouroux