From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is a `max-width' spec feasible? Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:18:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87pmqlr8a6.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87pmqmsx36.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 15:19:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyYU-00052y-8n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:19:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyYS-0001w1-Gy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:19:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyXh-0001Fp-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=52326 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyXf-0005Xp-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:19:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HhlPopdStdBUCbzm5ZCBlQmkx4kvksLy8GcZ4Z7peXw=; b=jta4khDoKjHVZ/zYkVETynAhNQ jCOUJlMtyAz0gOvv486WKQHYkygc1duTXews3uARm7mDoSdCCO0lDzAQp5+Qyq/m/MkKzzrRC4kMH b2E8itqHOIhO8Of3zAiCyuZKZ8okcDM/VvyLlaTUaqxTW/rYTWc2Zs8IF2OE76Rhq2n8=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyXa-0001CT-DE; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:19:00 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEX9/fnq5dPQ0M2u raC0w8VplIzr1qbhvWX3pxCSaC9aVSQyLBRXTzSclmf////+39xWAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+ULGw4RN5tvagsAAAGmSURBVDjLnZPBS8JQHMf3XpKBCZuiRRC4KXXoYq4ODYUs9R+I7kKg Hg0PBtXVnrcoSCSEoNPe5slTvjp1cipo0MFh/0vPLHDb85BfdtjeZ+/32/f7e+O4BQUWIPw/t8Ao cMnHJ7LMYtJErFrAJ0kwIiWtEHLQn9yTxDCUUpbXIQ93JV9EEgEvgFz2b1mgXwtpk1hYpI8X52vZ GQ90XaQXx7lRcaXCslBA2XXEM0C9XiygIgNgrWXUWQBV7x/JgAVQFlVZOwqojKbNBStw3yyjytSe bRZlgH4MulKnISsJTo0HUumSrdpUrtT21cMRC6T7l7XPqBMEjLdxQ313Ag8hr1gffTjAartLXvSD L8dB8BiEtPVEQp4MbFYbdB3rpjGwh7OjUYAbnaG9VBxrpK/q8iRpSzhmzSRY1bpRO+jkr3vjttai t3AWgGZ5q9cl2q19MkvNfKnXNdRDe2+vmisrGD85jEMcC8bbWsgBOGU/o4xajNi9scyZyUidA0Mh 2OBYEoTfIdslCsyR00zu5gDFfAbM39m/2aSHTuB5J+InsfJgTkWrvgHykXNhcXUPfQAAACV0RVh0 ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0xMS0yN1QxNDoxNzo1NSswMDowMOTIvwQAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9k aWZ5ADIwMjEtMTEtMjdUMTQ6MTc6NTUrMDA6MDCVlQe4AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Ladies of the Canyon_: "Morning Morgantown" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:07:54 -0500") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280340 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Side note: `truncate-string-to-width` doesn't just throw away the > excess but also inserts an ellipsis to announce the truncation, so if we > add such a `max-width` it'd be desirable to make it display an ellipsis > as well when truncating text. Yup. That does complicate the thing quite a bit, because we'd want to allow customising that, and the width of the ellipsis is very different on different displays, etc. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no