From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can watermarking Unicode text using invisible differences sneak through Emacs, or can Emacs detect it? Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 21:10:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87pmnrc0c1.fsf@logand.com> References: <83mtjc838i.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgna7hyd.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee4l78rw.fsf@gnu.org> <83tudf2h4z.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfswz834.fsf@gnu.org> <83leymyfz8.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfstwnve.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8xoup27.fsf@gnu.org> <835ypnutj8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14096"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, luangruo@yahoo.com, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 12 21:12:05 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nIykW-0003ZB-JL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 21:12:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49526 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIykV-0006t5-63 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIyjd-0005fA-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:11:09 -0500 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:52522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIyjZ-0000QK-CY; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:11:09 -0500 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F7031ADCB0; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 21:10:56 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 27.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286196 Archived-At: On Fri 11 Feb 2022 at 22:57, Richard Stallman wrote: > Earlier you said that the a(? translation was made by hand, so I am > somewhat confused now. > > Most of those entries are for characters without diacritics, it seems, > and I'm not talking about those. My objection is to some translations > of letters with diacritics. Their meanings are not guessable. I want > to replace them with sequences people will be able to understand at > first sight. In my native language, droping diacritics for ascii rather than imitating it with additional characters is usually more readable.