From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:30:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmlmn1pi.fsf@igel.home> References: <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7.ref@Ergus> <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7@Ergus> <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411135259.zqrlngj6lmpgbsni@Ergus> <83ilrf6779.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411142519.vnbr63lfpyuqpw2w@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28943"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 10:33:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1neBxP-0007MS-GQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:33:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51136 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neBxO-0005TJ-BX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neBur-00040A-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:30:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:51032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neBuo-0002A8-2d; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KczSB32Llz1r4ZX; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KczSB2gQLz1qty2; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:30:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KR2fjMEwto5J; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:30:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 11JfOfHvyEdVuiEpxR73PNSM1CwGSkGl/+O2Y+GRIjhJC8xj2WiiTz0yMKbqL2aG Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-183-143.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.183.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:30:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CB712C36DA; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:30:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: .. Now I think I just reached the state of HYPERTENSION that comes JUST BEFORE you see the TOTAL at the SAFEWAY CHECKOUT COUNTER! In-Reply-To: (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:16:50 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.9; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288279 Archived-At: On Apr 12 2022, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Not all systems use Exuberant Ctags or Universal Ctags. On the BSDs, > ctags is compatible with the Emacs ctags output (which is why it > exists, AFAIR). Exuberant Ctags etc do not work with either vi(1) or > mg(1) on those systems, and their output is at odds with what is > standardized by POSIX. Exuberant ctags was originally distributed with vim, so it is tailored for that. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."