From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Larger GC thresholds for non-interactive Emacs Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:18:37 +0800 Message-ID: <87pmizrgoi.fsf@localhost> References: <83bkuursya.fsf@gnu.org> <87h74l9jk8.fsf@localhost> <83bkutqb3z.fsf@gnu.org> <9778F176-E724-4E61-B0FB-327BCDD316C0@acm.org> <87sfo4epeo.fsf@localhost> <87bkurrc5e.fsf@localhost> <87bkur72b7.fsf@gnus.org> <874k0j40e7.fsf@gnus.org> <871qvm16he.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6aanm5j.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7yozzj0.fsf@gnus.org> <83k098kg6c.fsf@gnu.org> <8335fvg8kz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lynn Winebarger , larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mattiase@acm.org, theophilusx@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 09:20:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o4H8c-0008ku-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:20:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4H8b-0006kc-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 03:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4H5z-0004iZ-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 03:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]:45021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4H5k-0001Uy-IM; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 03:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id h34-20020a17090a29a500b001eb01527d9eso1716011pjd.3; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=hIaRDsxzLZVMQSYHo6vrC/j46YxMWUaFUVXZaS1XJlk=; b=o7lebwHLfCGKKKM865sK/0MAfr9pSVBDhmU6w9Vf8qzvrjqmnY29GvEOece2Q9ZpSg 4cE0OLh5VRHqS1z27zFoGBlOMKuX+hNbkxRLKo/Pqxc28Izi5FPJh32iUmykYLRfb4G8 uXqaSBZUYRS3FcALb9zwtgyBpgOQ8MWNY/XL3IxlRGEOYUjR1LzYpVf7BWdYo3oMX5K2 LZRfHm0N2CdK2rHlbLZUYMBRP0YtDydpwczMNbxYxMUZ5os7SRxM/4bMR76YnFR0rKVb WD0Ww7eYJf825PaaXnb1LPXPFAKQ4amDFEBw8eUhPKb0CLJ8H48zNDGe2XA/pVznfPva qMrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=hIaRDsxzLZVMQSYHo6vrC/j46YxMWUaFUVXZaS1XJlk=; b=QWys3ZeXM6+Sgn89A7VP2PUph3pAHOpGh4prcXicVeo990P/L6ZNhLbGSVADe9wt6O c9ncYpI2ucuuTNzjmZr9eMn+/HJSVWzmA5s3MqfnEW3dKsAR5wIf0rkRfW7HNKNiTXy0 x8p/1nP3A+bk6CHhEPncArBlxWBzN1WARbEjEpb2c5AX6YE8cdFt/Si9Jq7/UOclTb31 Ds+qyaBZRcje49TVnVBE5IwUGusPrmd85Zyy+K296PcpW4zc4B7FObL/Ohgta0mxKBdM j66zJNXc8+D1z7u5hZPK6T8a/yCjnf8Xb2IOaUgkZX+NW12N924U85QH5H3cKmN+/dbP IPnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/Ti4b6vo+6OapE+iiUwyt9rddfBgUUCfRahmuDqMMNjEfdxzx2 X4QZpvEOp9OXDNf73cyI9R72zfZMsmwKlJBr X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uF9rI085LDAirwvuuas1z02AkisCwUo6f7JjPzL/8tJ5gw2qQEfZ6YZnwR77dG2o9bUC/1Pw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2585:b0:16a:3c86:c76b with SMTP id jb5-20020a170903258500b0016a3c86c76bmr10650065plb.88.1655968645791; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([107.158.194.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iw21-20020a170903045500b0016a091eb88esm11539672plb.126.2022.06.23.00.17.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335fvg8kz.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1033.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291526 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Not that I don't enjoy trawling through old threads in the emacs-devel archive >> (searching for mmap led to a thread from the introduction of the portable dumper), >> but it would be a lot easier if there were design notes somewhere recording >> the rationale of the decisions reflected in the current code. > > We lack someone in the role of the "project historian", who would then > summarize and publish the design discussions in the form of such > notes. Volunteers are most welcome. What about simply following a convention to link relevant discussion in the commit message? Best, Ihor