From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Larger GC thresholds for non-interactive Emacs Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:02:36 +0800 Message-ID: <87pmizajtv.fsf@localhost> References: <83bkutqb3z.fsf@gnu.org> <9778F176-E724-4E61-B0FB-327BCDD316C0@acm.org> <87sfo4epeo.fsf@localhost> <87bkurrc5e.fsf@localhost> <87bkur72b7.fsf@gnus.org> <874k0j40e7.fsf@gnus.org> <871qvm16he.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6aanm5j.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7yozzj0.fsf@gnus.org> <83k098kg6c.fsf@gnu.org> <8335fvg8kz.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmizrgoi.fsf@localhost> <83zgi3espf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13046"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: owinebar@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mattiase@acm.org, theophilusx@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 10:04:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o4HpD-0003Cp-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:04:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4HpC-0005J2-6A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:04:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4HmP-0003fG-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]:40576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4HmJ-0008KA-Q0; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id s20-20020a056830439400b0060c3e43b548so14873852otv.7; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:01:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=1nazxu0+o/18g1fB4DJe673tdPRqoR+CYHufldX9Nik=; b=DxLlhsWpIW1LYANsV0SNxIVjl1+OoRfAczqPh5xqCBEpFkhYWz3bsF76Hf7+NE/wND PEAunsnylohSoAyz2icvdrPzvKVHDs18hUVn9Z1JNPGs3jk3pHh60zACP6vfHthy8Owx jbZyqOA84rulWvaBtdWzoFnBWHliHYVa63mZEltzfg3U0352qReUZv4w0A3qKfczOZTO heXI7M02JuhpEN+ydY9TWohS1/ZiED0yJvmJxDEPky6eyxdLD+AxcTFNXsjUJ6ct8w8C PJjl2UnurgspYHFDyf1b6Hamoh4YWe+z9nQfvQvZ8iLTHtsVBilj55s9lww6rdnMjfWG WoGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=1nazxu0+o/18g1fB4DJe673tdPRqoR+CYHufldX9Nik=; b=6B1pI3SWdX+RMZwMjsG5hbh4pa2lpsRAnQhz6hiMEWuLzue/Sd1641wKlYItCteDla ZLNSoLAPzbW58mX6bJA8YcdajW5wyauekFT58MDKnSs8BQz2i8lHEuI/hDTGYbsb9kl1 Ollwoje9EQC7E9fiEUSzCgVfpAVWtmgMSraKxL+kOVJsQlKsEeowSok5yN7coX2fuRgy /uucfsQHjmVsjAOyQHKkeQqlmcou+lt8ZI9Y7hsU0Hj08LaFjXtiDKuqrwXcnqy/TZ5e XIC3d1jiCkKebmtrPqrt84EdxA+f+sQ3/vj3VX+25YYh5gCwzO9q25LSKqBRq4f/bPBG SQVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8wdZFDp6pJjy8evSslyno5MLduKlZhyOz244CtsgnKx/oOg9ji dr+jrFdWFPpAGB5Egxj/0V4q2sC8NgyS51QV X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1unUyhf+Dfi4EewITRDVaODhEZxfK3ptEsxqZZiMRBBaMaJ6HbhyCvFuohUd5UABzRKxtICyg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4d95:0:b0:60c:310d:a79b with SMTP id u21-20020a9d4d95000000b0060c310da79bmr3235889otk.184.1655971285524; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([207.126.88.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9-20020a9d7ac9000000b0060c030fae2asm12291616otn.54.2022.06.23.01.01.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:01:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zgi3espf.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::329; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-x329.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291529 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> What about simply following a convention to link relevant discussion in >> the commit message? > > That convention does exist, and the results of its use are before our > eyes ;-). It doesn't help that Git doesn't support retroactive > modifications of commit logs, except via cumbersome workarounds that > no one seems to like using. Good to know. > And that won't help with past discussions whose commits are in the > tree for many years. Can't the past discussions be directly updated by sending an extra email that links back to the new commit? > But yes, using such links is definitely helpful, and I'd encourage > people to use that more. (That's one reason why changes should > preferably be discussed on the bug tracker: the bug number -- if not > forgotten to be mentioned in the log message -- serves as a pointer to > the discussions.) What about the message ID? It should also be unique enough to link to the relevant ML thread. (it is a bit annoying that lists.gnu.org does not support easy search via link id, unlike e.g. https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/87r13n5muk.fsf@gnus.org/). Best, Ihor