From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Augusto Stoffel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Tree-sitter integration in python.el Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:38:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmezelj3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <3A68545C-2E40-4BB4-8563-8041A5452634@gmail.com> <87y1twlr0v.fsf@gmail.com> <83czb8ycpo.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu4klfcw.fsf@gmail.com> <87ill0le20.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1ttfmj8.fsf@gmail.com> <19950F30-F4DB-4CE4-9257-24DA39594669@gmail.com> <87czb47jya.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn9c7xxd.fsf@gmail.com> <875ygu91z4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18437"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Yuan Fu , Matthias Meulien , Eli Zaretskii , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 10 17:45:01 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohuxh-0004XM-0h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:45:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohuxf-0005o7-6z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:44:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohure-000405-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::631]:33419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohurc-0000Ix-Id; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id q9so21175616ejd.0; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:38:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zh6/WEj1dYy0dftFxpImMBNZX8VG/qHaYtx2eLRfwDQ=; b=ROVlFOR4/xkIFV1NMiM2eghFZ9mXGbgWVCjlHXvtZNYXBk1EefzUtqBW5rpDbcjTZ0 dA2rcwgb+M9g40zuYFxJPcKh/Tk1eLHWwm6ZS+hRvDdHD47N+vfl7V95Qat5Mn5b5b8T fpqJDJrhaZnA1WGW3Y/ExsG+wBkkZ/2HA97S9JsX3yEWzW8Mc6b6qxMW/dgXTM0BmM9Q 1fe38TL8WGAb8TswQ8yM0+1LKdZDnMu94oM+QPA87P/EJ8dbmZHffXVbiRBdjPn4UTAZ 2F7x5Tx0vzN6/gc9JJf3QxV7DwN6Y/aQXcz4JtPRAzsyTsgbAKaQMXxqQQurGnxE8Mns ZrRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zh6/WEj1dYy0dftFxpImMBNZX8VG/qHaYtx2eLRfwDQ=; b=w2F1ONK+CR6rD5MUpomfBv7QCJzJ8MtHYcEifCTi8t7S0CstnIVwFmyunKNmhgydQ/ KKe0ftlc4VISHm2Z/xUSt+P9FCZTPwD2ZhlDxKukGC0tTXZF7sq97gtKwTemeZ2FEgYv 5KZAtaKOpbguYDU+RYDOlu90VBN9WcwoKTqZ0NjSx8OW7d5lmiiojVkguolDmU2nq5Zf 3qZEzr5NhKMHW1ccqI6eHJ7lxFFrS38LQHrOra6iAxCz2tOh4w9IDo/m/n0vPebkg7ch fjn6ECMdzck32zySojn5tZefdJCfq7CzBo6Op4rt1GOaSaoaxbs4EO3lVuaXLJeKgPcx UnNA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3xNdhOyx6Nr54f4eCmC/1NnU6Gm70bsBydD/f/SKdB3kYpaRm6 EOZlci7Eib+18iAVUY2DjskK+4kixK59wQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7BvisXNmcFKwLN9rz5yu649BLpRfGe68ujokjEdyJf2X0RQ6Mz75Wjmj21Atz8V43w01lTXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4786:b0:78d:b793:5bf6 with SMTP id cw6-20020a170906478600b0078db7935bf6mr4201755ejc.222.1665416321960; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ars3 ([2a02:8109:8ac0:56d0::89aa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h17-20020a170906829100b007801ce34311sm5625874ejx.19.2022.10.10.08.38.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 8 Oct 2022 16:20:10 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::631; envelope-from=arstoffel@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x631.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297374 Archived-At: On Sat, 8 Oct 2022 at 16:20, Drew Adams wrote: > Why should the `font-lock-ignore' feature > being discussed (for which I haven't found > any spec or code, the only thread I found for > it starting with Eli's comments [1] on some > previous thread (somewhere?) about "master > 5c70ff9") obviate the usefulness of font-lock > levels? Why does the one preclude use of the > other? The font-lock-ignore variable is available in the master branch. It has a docstring and a manual entry. I think nobody said it precludes the need for a more coarse-grained customization option; I only said in passing that in alternative universe it could have been used as the basis to implement font-lock-maximum-decoration.