From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding the `prescient` packages to NonGNU ELPA? Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 16:07:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87pmcivwrq.fsf@posteo.net> References: <16193c73-ab80-04c9-558f-d5e6142f38f3@protonmail.com> <871qpydllo.fsf@posteo.net> <874jutft6g.fsf@gmail.com> <87pmcj2lsg.fsf@posteo.net> <877cyq5qym.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: North Year , Visuwesh , Okamsn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 17 17:08:44 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p6Zjv-00070K-W0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:08:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6ZjD-0001nl-M1; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 11:07:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6ZjC-0001nb-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 11:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6ZjA-0004KW-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 11:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B759C240029 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:07:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1671293273; bh=RBD+lV+4VpyHnuOA+9UEKf04Ndr0alz2VwW8rOvyiuM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=lWou5U0JwXfUN/SnsHvx/mXT3DmMcPgBC864emiTbWUCkIGKrUqe1nB8uDgnZrGQY VkmOo1uOA7H0XHVyzDVKZjABKxztFZ7h8IJTZfnPYXZdgA1RSPW+ivh4EEjMjCc1WA OtOFeJPoATBXk1JucxkHboB0zNMo02jr+DGQVp3l7St6yLe+TFL4rhsVD+u1bFJSnt U9NPjfeSDJbfN113wsPMXANUxbFnqL88Eeusu/8JMGPveHIQGqtg0FZnPoqmgcYMhb wvkv6sS9JFW74PCLkRpI7za+qlV/e7R1FWIJEwVLxC36uK4pg86yfn09uPZ8JsQKd+ ZCgVHtBD9Ps9A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NZ9qD5699z6tmg; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:07:50 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 17 Dec 2022 10:52:23 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301569 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The only issue I can think about is if later on someone else wants to >> add a package that depends on a specific "sub-package", and they find >> themselves in a conflict specifying their dependency list, in case this >> hypothetical package is to be distributed both via ELPA and MELPA. > > Not our problem? So let it be written, so let it be done. I will prepare the package with everything bundled into a single package, and see if that works out.