From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] Proposing to add express to ELPA Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 20:10:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87pm3tih6m.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <0C0218D1-6C00-4E5A-9E6E-6282F170126A@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38565"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:uRQqRJEfjxcjUjbqaz0VgrWy4bU= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 11 20:41:49 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qUX53-0009oe-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 20:41:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qUX4r-0001Pg-Ng; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qUWfD-00007k-49 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qUWfA-00026T-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qUWf8-0005vf-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 20:15:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:41:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308590 Archived-At: Yuan Fu wrote: >> Since Emacs 29 is now released, I’d like to propose adding >> expreg to ELPA. Expreg can be considered a lite version of >> expand-region. The notable difference is its use of >> tree-sitter for language-specific expansions. I also took >> the liberty to do things differently than expand-region, >> eg, expreg uses a smaller number of expanders [1]; it is >> easier to debug when the expansion isn’t what you expected; >> and it only provides two functions for expansion and >> contraction, and one variable for adding/removing >> expanders—no transient maps and other “smart” features, nor >> different variables to set for each major mode. > > What do you think, guys? Should it be added to ELPA? Sure! -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal