From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Suhail Singh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:54:11 -0400 Message-ID: <87plo6cvxo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wmj7dftf.fsf@posteo.net> <87setvxyt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzf7o13b.fsf@posteo.net> <87msk3jr0u.fsf@gmail.com> <87setum5do.fsf@posteo.net> <87msk1520e.fsf@gmail.com> <87settknf1.fsf@posteo.net> <87tte8akwa.fsf@gmail.com> <878qvjaep6.fsf@posteo.net> <87cykvwixn.fsf@gmail.com> <3BC7EB33-504C-4532-A2DF-83712B64878E@gmail.com> <86v7yh8ugg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32044"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Charles Choi , suhailsingh247@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, meedstrom@runbox.eu, tonyzorman@mailbox.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 12 07:32:07 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1szUjX-0008DZ-14 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:32:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szUir-000421-07; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szKmQ-00069o-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:54:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szKmP-0007zS-JR; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:54:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4605674e9cdso3932291cf.2; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:54:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728672864; x=1729277664; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nPnCROkAkWWhW6d2lSZBzHfNv5uP24EGkr2MKiH7cOo=; b=azwKv1FCh/2VAXroJkuLWaA2UKoLdND+FMcgdgJ/It63X1mu6AqlKFqwcTRtN+PJjY sAhYcn3UcKvb4EVOnCSxTmOm0fBUUB/Y94BbyipQKoDDSkj8tNh8lkvXmwjZpUzqoY5J oyDs9owg0i2un+OUBCucPEsWlznCr44VHdB7mrCXcee2xSraSze5dMoJuNPHUFv70lKk W4xpIMWbbP+632CqYJLqGEp16OK2vj+c+Du97mVSMNJOQ2kBcCJfpF6h/qmzPLeYVKye Of7LyDlpfeMzI7uhrbRMyi/5LlAQx1XNh9rZ2qhE6x+aKSeHeKFiOG1y1rGryGzbhcKY hL/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728672864; x=1729277664; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nPnCROkAkWWhW6d2lSZBzHfNv5uP24EGkr2MKiH7cOo=; b=r+kUW4sST4Giqy9pbokYqk3FZ4nOndlpJOnbv4QmLsDj9JHi25PerV5wx+49VRFZ/E 8umKx7YbsJdhgg7GA8kWoWVrl3rs5Vwk82WSlz+/9LzYQ5cQ77g9j+O7xuwEgb0GGe1Q XqTB4CL88blRFtcqZ5iUJUSlCc6Swwadovq9IHS7u3nTGDNG/X/70sKHOE818a/t6Vz4 CZIzUnDyu7HAiJNoJZwnhuixRVSZmgasAoQJqCNeUWdyYOejyX3eTUxLcbDg/VjsBo5i rLTyDpR1nDK7dKu9pPALrefYhXiTP6wS055m/qgNzxh+0rLx+fLyJCp5l9ewsF7lkW1R 0cFQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVwT7ejGWc0mPIHh4VPAcbagrbqCz0E+6RlQc343l6TrrtAfYshowtMl4VgFxP+fUoELcmUu18Rn2RbEA==@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx9D28t+JfeEDB8QevzeKWhtfPaTBCWZipeb5c2uCFCj2mpwPZ9 TY/1e4O28OzfPotIIf4CZ/JpXR4DVjaBrMRjbzLb/mVdxaSAqaxy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEFfI/OKOtPvwnuSWit8nYcOXu+z8MGIah/AWSingNWeCsEIXFVDeuE9yguzVmAYVY4S026Ow== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7e8e:0:b0:458:3215:960c with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4605846e2dbmr10878741cf.29.1728672863614; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from gnus ([70.48.225.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-460427dce1fsm17957511cf.36.2024.10.11.11.54.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:54:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86v7yh8ugg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:46:39 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::842; envelope-from=suhailsingh247@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x842.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:31:23 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324505 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > As long as the version tag tags the commit where the corresponding > "Version:" entered the mainline, be it a merge-commit or a regular > commit, the mismatch alert should not happen. Would that be possible to implement? My (perhaps mistaken) understanding was that the archives only track the specific commits. I.e., for a package that's in both NonGNU and MELPA Stable, the latter could point to the merge commit whereas the former would point to its ancestor. In such a case, looking at simply the commit hash and without checking out the source code it may not be possible to identify that the commits are "equivalent". -- Suhail