From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:17:44 +0100 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87odokglmf.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> References: <85ac04xhg3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169936289 4371 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2007 22:18:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Miles Bader , Emacs Devel , Andreas Schwab To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 27 23:18:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HAvs5-0006M7-Ii for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:18:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAvs5-0004uh-32 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HAvrt-0004rR-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:17:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HAvro-0004l6-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:17:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAvro-0004kq-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:17:48 -0500 Original-Received: from yeast.orebokech.com ([82.67.41.165]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HAvrl-0001R4-MO; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3]) by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D9B13065; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:17:44 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 711DC53187; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:17:44 +0100 (CET) X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM, "Juanma Barranquero" , Andreas Schwab , Miles Bader , Emacs Devel In-Reply-To: <85ac04xhg3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sat\, 27 Jan 2007 22\:55\:56 +0100") X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4 (tstamp-) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65541 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > I don't think that the ability to byte-compile code with circular > lists is really important enough to warrant this sort of > inconvenience. I think we should revert this change for now, and add it back after the release. -- Romain Francoise | The sea! the sea! the open it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the | ever free! --Bryan W. Procter