From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: My Emacs unicode 2 crash again when I do some *Replace String (M-%)*, I give the debug informations under gdb in the attachments. Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:36:18 +0900 Message-ID: <87odmxbyrx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <20070306063056.GA21948@debian-testing-hy.localdomain> <86zm6q5upr.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <17902.9556.720278.162036@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85bqizpiu6.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <871wjvc7or.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173756431 10128 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2007 03:27:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 04:26:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQxf7-0004GZ-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:26:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQxfq-0005xh-81 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQxfc-0005t6-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQxfb-0005rm-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQxfb-0005rj-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:27:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQxem-0003qK-Qx; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391357FF6; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:26:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FC1D1A25C6; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:36:19 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" (+CVS-20070216) XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67840 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The problem is, again, that the list of -fxxx options that, if > disabled, will make the program much easier to debug, is not known We already have one (-fno-cross-jumps or similar). Others can be added as people find out about them. I'm simply saying that this information should be available to *all* Emacs developers (eg, by configuring with --marquis-de-sade-optimizations=no-thank-you), not just to those who happen to read every post David makes. > except to the few GCC developers. So ask them, once in a while, politely. And if the gods smile and you get a useful answer, put it in aclocal. That's all I'm suggesting. It's not a huge amount of work. > So I don't think we know what to put in aclocal. Everything we'd like to put there? No. Tedious to maintain? Probably, it will need to be gcc-version-dependent. Better than nothing? Well, I think so.