From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: w32 redisplay lags much more seriously when editing big files. Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:24 -0400 Message-ID: <87od4l71lr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <42b562540807230124y588d41fdh616ca93d7352b36e@mail.gmail.com> <475204970807240925o2e555db6u32cc098c58261182@mail.gmail.com> <475204970807240925w2d1a1885rb5797b4a627da2a3@mail.gmail.com> <87zlo6n0xz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217043766 28431 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2008 03:42:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: finalpatch Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 26 05:43:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMagu-0005h2-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:43:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMag1-0002oV-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMafv-0002oG-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMafq-0002nz-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59536 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMafq-0002nw-6q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.63.201.57]:12057 helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMafq-0001dO-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83D34C05C; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:42:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (finalpatch's message of "Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:33:58 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101493 Archived-At: finalpatch writes: > i did a -pg build last night and played with the executable a > bit. here's the first few lines of the gprof output. i'm not sure if > it's normal for "mark_object" to use so many cpu cycles but i'm not > familiar with the code anyway. if anybody is interested i'll be glad > to send him the complete file. Thanks very much. Could you compile a similar list on GNU/Linux, for comparison?