From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-visual never set to nil? Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87od4kfn5w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <18571.25125.311010.324079@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87od4k1nj5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <18571.32039.151433.449795@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217101320 31912 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2008 19:42:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: raman@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 26 21:42:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMpfF-0002o9-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:42:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMpeL-0004sT-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMpeG-0004sL-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMpeF-0004s9-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33916 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMpeF-0004s6-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: from c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.63.201.57]:15739 helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMpeF-0002i9-PF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26CB6C059; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <18571.32039.151433.449795@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (T. V. Raman's message of "Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:38:15 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101562 Archived-At: "T. V. Raman" writes: > I think line-move-visual should start off set consistent with > visual-line-mode. I also think it should be renamed to match with > visual-line-mode -- ie visual-line-move -- not line-move-visual --- > otherwise users will never be able to discover and set it. But line-move-visual (and word-wrap) can be turned on independently; visual-line-mode simply goes a step further and rebinds some editing keys in addition to setting line-move-visual and word-wrap. How about renaming line-move-visual to line-move-by-screen-lines?