From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Spammers are now closing bugs Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87ocurgoui.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> References: <87ab6cphof.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240252234 8289 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2009 18:30:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 20 20:31:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LvyHZ-00026z-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:31:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvyGA-00040e-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvyG5-0003zw-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvyG2-0003y3-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45238 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvyG1-0003xy-PH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33071) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvyG1-0002wn-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2009 18:30:15 -0000 Original-Received: from p548676DF.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO turtle.gmx.de) [84.134.118.223] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 20 Apr 2009 20:30:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+uLa95wr2upTIYz8tUpn3cMDh0B7VeXQ50op34pp NvLlEImsjFUYDJ Original-Received: by turtle.gmx.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95B54354AF; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:30:13 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:14:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110373 Archived-At: On 2009-04-20 20:14 +0200, Glenn Morris wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: > >> Note that this will only happen to bugs that had been closed (and >> reopened) before, since this is necessary for the spammers to pick up >> the nnnn-done address. > > Oh, I see. > > Do they get the addresses from the bug web-pages? I suspect so, although a few mailinglist archives may also have them. > I can't think of a single reason to have unobscured email addresses > visible on the bug web pages, as they are at present. I concur, but for Debian the debbugs maintainers have always rejected address obfuscation. See http://bugs.debian.org/63995 and siblings. > I see a spammer has just closed bug 1407 again. > How annoying for the person who opened this bug. He might not have the highest opinion of the Emacs bug tracker now, yes. Sven