From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Hagelberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET merge Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:20:01 -0700 Message-ID: <87ocov9bji.fsf@hagelb.org> References: <87hbun9jbs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254162027 11211 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2009 18:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 28 20:20:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MsKpc-0004kf-2s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:20:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46463 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MsKpb-0003s3-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MsKpX-0003rf-1G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MsKpS-0003q0-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38575 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MsKpS-0003pc-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145]:57616 helo=homiemail-a15.g.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MsKpR-0004qK-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from enigma (96-26-232-193.sea.clearwire-dns.net [96.26.232.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by homiemail-a15.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D0DB76C065; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:20:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hbun9jbs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:31:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115731 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > I have merged most of the CEDET branch into the trunk. You may need to > bootstrap; please let me know if there are any build failures. > > I have done what I can to clean up CEDET to conform to Emacs standards; > if you see anything I missed, please go ahead and make the change. Thanks. I am working on Rudel, a library that requires CEDET, and this should make the install process much easier. Rudel uses eieio as well as inversion.el, fame.el, and working.el. The last three of these are files from CEDET's common/ directory. From what I can tell, fame.el and working.el were not included in the merge. Was this intentional? What were the deciding factors in what to include? Perhaps they could be offered using package.el if we decide to integrate it into Emacs? -Phil