Re: Base patch for bug #5975 (bookmarking from Gnus Article buffer).

[Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:29:11 +0200
>> 
>> if patch WORK and is basically correct and is accepted of course, why
>> not applying patch as it is and modifying as Emacs developpers like in
>> one or more little other commits.
>
> Because there's a pedagogical value for the contributors in having
> them fix their code according to review comments.

That's the case where contributor modify himself the code according to
diverse comments. I agree.

But i am speaking of the case where contributor's code is modified by Emacs
developers, in this case it is better (IMHO) to commit over the initial
patch, specially if Emacs developer misunderstand some part of code and
make wrong changes (That's not the case here Karl ;-)) it is easier to
find whats wrong instead of long discussion.
Generally contributor need to all rewrite, sometime long time further.
That is extra work for contributor and also Emacs developer. 
 
> In general, you learn better what you do yourself, rather than
> watching others do it for you.

Yes i agree completely.

-- 
Thierry Volpiatto
Get my Gnupg key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997