From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elpa.gnu.org (Stale archive-contents?) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:20:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87oc9v96j0.fsf@altern.org> References: <81vd48xive.fsf@gmail.com> <87tyjryhui.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <81fwvar0a4.fsf@gmail.com> <874obqza7f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bp5y6yhi.fsf@gnu.org> <87oc9yq63h.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrolm88t.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aalhayiv.fsf@altern.org> <87r5etkofc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r5es3lqh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289499549 10200 80.91.229.12 (11 Nov 2010 18:19:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 11 19:19:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGbjd-00018i-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:19:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGbjZ-0000gJ-La for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:18:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39478 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGZsk-0005oT-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGZsj-0004rY-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:64591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGZsj-0004rS-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so1002458gwj.0 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:20:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=sInN83kqUfpI6iES9DoO+dUerx4ES2yfcTFSMz/Bfsc=; b=xuPEaQhWE68hgaYOj6ltcS7Sdo18Xt1UyxPSCNCAGEJxjlcxWtV2H4aU3GyCPfwxsJ QUVx69pmzgwRP/vRgJh0qr1dEQjokuGgEEZtvc3ivb1K2uYE+mUrOsrwa9euN5zE+cVS 9HrqV1RFr+QExJ09YqOAb6w1FnzIGRJiIPqYs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=ZIxBlrL5Z7ZyeeHroZIjdqY2Q0s3nDbsPTols4vZYmLvDrAMIz80iciEb7uSxNs/Gl Mgmnjit6ADDtruH5oPGOmmyLf6I6x15Yts6Hu5g5v7ua3GZsnxiPceNYV5ysGAFbzCfg Twwc+IcU/HzvHeqLAEeBsYq88fY+BqfScmhJo= Original-Received: by 10.216.25.9 with SMTP id y9mr2541848wey.83.1289492411600; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:20:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (fon75-1-78-192-119-5.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.119.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l14sm1405595weq.35.2010.11.11.08.20.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:20:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A90C73FCB5; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:20:03 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87r5es3lqh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:35:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:18:46 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132548 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: >> Yeah, I think it should have flushed the older package when elpa.gnu.org >> doesn't have it anymore. Installing that invalid package will fail in >> any case, but I think what you describe is a bug. > > This was a bug in package.el; I've just checked in a fix. Thanks! -- Bastien